<\/p>\n
by Michael Dickinson \u2013 <\/strong>Counterpunch<\/strong><\/em> \u2013 28.1.2015<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n This week Britain is commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the death of Winston Churchill. Millions of people worldwide watched his state funeral on television in 1965, and thousands of people lined the streets of London to pay their last respects as his cortege slowly passed. But I somehow doubt that President Obama will be adding his own warm words of remembrance for the iconic British wartime leader.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n After all, his own paternal grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was one of 150.000 rebellious Kikuyu \u201cblackamoors\u201d forced into detention camps during Churchill\u2019s postwar premiership, when the British governnment began its brutal campaign to suppress the alleged \u201cMau Mau\u201d uprising in Kenya, in order to protect the privileges of the white settler population at the expense of the indigenous people. About 11,000 Kenyans were killed and 81,000 detained during the British government\u2019s campaign to protect its imperialist heritage.<\/span><\/p>\n Suspected Mau Mau insurgents were subject to electric shock, whippings, burning and mutilation in order to crush the local drive for independence. Obama\u2019s grandfather was imprisoned without trial for two years and tortured for resisting Churchill\u2019s empire. He never truly recovered from the ordeal.<\/span><\/p>\n Africa was quite a playground for young Winston. Born into the privileged British elite in in 1847, educated at Harrow and Sandhurst, brought up believing the simple story that the superior white man was conquering the primitive, dark-skinned natives, and bringing them the benefits of civilisation, he set off as soon as he could to take his part in \u201ca lot of jolly little wars against barbarous peoples,\u201d whose violence was explained by a \u201cstrong aboriginal propensity to kill\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n In Sudan, he bragged that he personally shot at least three \u201csavages\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n In South Africa, where \u201cit was great fun galloping about,\u201d he defended British built concentration camps for white Boers, saying they produced \u201cthe minimum of suffering\u201d.\u00a0\u00a0 The death toll was almost 28,000.<\/span><\/p>\n When at least 115,000 black Africans were likewise swept into British camps, where 14,000 died, he wrote only of his \u201cirritation that Kaffirs should be allowed to fire on white men\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n (On his attitude to other races, Churchill\u2019s doctor, Lord Moran, once said: \u201cWinston thinks only of the colour of their skin.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Churchill found himself in other British dominions besides Africa.\u00a0\u00a0 As a young officer in the Swat valley, now part of Pakistan, Churchill one day experienced a fleeting revelation. The local population, he wrote in a letter, was fighting back because of \u201cthe presence of British troops in lands the local people considered their own,\u201d \u2013 just as Britain would if she were invaded.<\/span><\/p>\n This idle thought was soon dismissed however , and he gladly took part in raids that laid waste to whole valleys, destroying houses and burning crops, believing the \u201cnatives\u201d to be helpless children who will \u201cwillingly, naturally, gratefully include themselves within the golden circle of an ancient crown\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n But rebels had to be crushed with extreme force. As Colonial Secretary in the 1920s, Churchill unleashed the notorious Black and Tan thugs on Ireland\u2019s Catholic civilians, making a hypocritical mockery of his comment:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cIndeed it is evident that Christianity, however degraded and distorted by cruelty and intolerance, must always exert a modifying influence on men\u2019s passions, and protect them from the more violent forms of fanatical fever, as we are protected from smallpox by vaccination.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n His fear-mongering views on Islam sound strangely familiar:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cBut the Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cOn the subject of India,\u201d said the British Secretary of State to India: \u201cWinston is not quite sane\u2026 I didn\u2019t see much difference between his outlook and Hitler\u2019s.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n When Mahatma Gandhi launched his campaign of peaceful resistance against British rule in India, Churchill raged that Gandhi:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cought to be lain bound hand and foot at the gates of Delhi, and then trampled on by an enormous elephant with the new Viceroy seated on its back. Gandhi-ism and everything it stands for will have to be grappled with and crushed.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In 1931 he sneered: \u201cIt is alarming and also nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi, a seditious Middle Temple lawyer of the type well-known in the East, now posing as a fakir, striding half naked up the steps of the Viceregal palace to parley on equal terms with the representative of the King-Emperor.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n As Gandhi\u2019s support increased, Churcill announced:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In 1943 a famine broke out in Bengal, caused by the imperial policies of the British. In reply to the Secretary of State for India\u2019s telegram requesting food stock to relieve the famine, Churchill wittily replied:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cIf food is scarce, why isn\u2019t Gandhi dead yet?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Up to 3 million people starved to death. Asked in 1944 to explain his refusal to send food aid, Churchill jeered:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cRelief would do no good. Indians breed like rabbits and will outstrip any available food supply.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n Churchill statue in London. Photo: Getty Images.<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Just after World War I, approximately one quarter of the world\u2019s land and population fell within the spheres of British influence. The Empire had increased in size with the addition of territories taken from its vanquished enemies.<\/span><\/p>\n As British Colonial Secretary, Churchill\u2019s power in the Middle East was immense. He <\/em>\u201ccreated Jordan with a stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon\u201d, allegedly drawing the expansive boundary map after a generous lunch. The huge zigzag in Jordan\u2019s eastern border with Saudi Arabia has been called \u201cWinston\u2019s Hiccup\u201d or \u201cChurchill\u2019s Sneeze\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n He is the man who invented Iraq, another arbitrary patch of desert, which was awarded to a throneless Hashemite prince; Faisal, whose brother Abdullah was given control of Jordan. Sons of King Hussein, Faisal and Abdullah had been war buddies of Churchill\u2019s pal, the famous \u201cT.E. Lawrence of Arabia\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n But the lines drawn in the sand by British imperialism, locking together conflicting peoples behind arbitrary borders were far from stable,and large numbers of Jordanians, Iraqis, Kurds and Palestinians were denied anything resembling real democracy.<\/span><\/p>\n In 1920 Churchill advocated the use of chemical weapons on the \u201cuncooperative Arabs\u201d involved in the Iraqi revolution against British rule.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas,\u201d he declared. \u201cI am strongly in favor of using poison gas against uncivilized tribes. It would spread a lively terror.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n As Colonial Secretary, it was Churchill who offered the Jews their free ticket to the \u2018Promised Land\u2019 of \u2018Israel\u2019, although he thought they should not \u201ctake it for granted that the local population will be cleared out to suit their convenience.\u201d He dismissed the Palestinians already living in the country as \u201cbarbaric hoards who ate little but camel dung.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Addressing the Peel Commission (1937) on why Britain was justified in deciding the fate of Palestine, Churchill clearly displayed his white supremacist ideology to justify one of the most brutal genocides and mass displacements of people in history, based on his belief that \u201cthe Aryan stock is bound to triumph\u201d:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In fact, many of the views Churchill held were virtually Nazi. \u00a0Apart from his support of hierarchical racism, as Home Minister he had advocated euthanasia and sterilisation of the handicapped.<\/span><\/p>\n In 1927, after a visit to Rome, he applauded the budding fascist dictator, Mussolini:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWhat a man! I have lost my heart!\u2026 Fascism has rendered a service to the entire world\u2026 If I were Italian, I am sure I would have been with you entirely from the beginning of your victorious struggle against the bestial appetites and passion of Leninism.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n (\u201cThe Bestial Appetites and Passions of Leninism\u201d, eh? Where can I get a copy?)<\/span><\/p>\n But years later, in his written account of the Second World War (Vol. 111), fickle-hearted Winston applauded the downfall of his erstwhile hero:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cHitler\u2019s fate was sealed. Mussolini\u2019s fate was sealed. As for the Japanese, they would be ground to powder.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Britain\u2019s American allies saw to that in Hiroshima and Nagasaki when they dropped their atomic bombs and killed hundreds of thousands of Japanese citizens.<\/span><\/p>\n Meanwhile, Prime Minister Churchill had ordered the saturation bombing of Dresden, where, on February 13 1945, more than 500,000 German civilians and refugees, mostly women and children, were slaughtered in one day by the British Royal Air Force (RAF) and the United States Army Air Force (USAAF), who dropped over 700,000 phosphorus bombs on the city.<\/span><\/p>\n Prime Minister Churchill had said earlier:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI do not want suggestions as to how we can disable the economy and the machinery of war, what I want are suggestions as to how we can roast the German refugees on their escape from Breslau.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In Dresden he got his wish. Those who perished in the centre of the city could not be traced, as the temperature in the area reached 1600 degree Centigrade. Dresden\u2019s citizens barely had time to reach their shelters and many who sought refuge underground suffocated as oxygen was pulled from the air to feed the flames. Others perished in a blast of white heat strong enough to melt human flesh.<\/span><\/p>\n Instead of being charged with being responsible for ordering one of the most horrific war crimes of recent history, in which up to half a million people died screaming in his firestorms, Churchill emerged from the war as a hero. An unwavering supporter of the British monarchy throughout his life, he was made a knight of the Order of the Garter, Britain\u2019s highest order of knighthoods, by Queen Elizabeth II in 1953.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201c<\/strong>The monarchy is so extraordinarily useful. When Britain wins a battle she shouts, \u201cGod save the Queen\u201d; when she loses, she votes down the prime minister,\u201d he once said.<\/span><\/p>\n Shortly after the Second World War was won, however, Churchill\u2019s Conservative government was voted down by a Britain tired of battle, austerity, and hungry for change.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cHistory will be kind to me for I intend to write it,\u201d said Churchill, and to a certain extent he succeeded. exte habit of dictating in the nude to his male secretaries. y and conscriptioneople were massacred \u2018Winnie\u2019 became Britain\u2019s great national icon, with his trade-mark cigar and V-sign, remembered for leading Britain through her finest hour (we won\u2019t mention his eccentric habit of pacing about the office in the nude while dictating to secretaries!) The fat cigar clamped in his mouth a symbol of cocky British defiance, Churchill was genial courageous Big Brother figure, revered by the media. His stirring wartime speech:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWe shall fight them on the beaches! We shall never surrender!\u201d makes no mention of \u201cWe shall bomb them in their cities! We shall make them suffer!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Churchill\u2019s brutality and brutishness have been ignored, but he never reckoned on the invention of the internet, or its power to allow authors to question his view of history and expose the cruelty and racism of the man.<\/span><\/p>\n When George W Bush moved out of the White House he left a bust of Winston Churchill in the Oval office. He\u2019d used it to inspire him on his \u2018war against terrorism\u2019. Barack Obama had it removed. \u00a0I wonder if he found the bust offensive? Was it out of respect for the pain and distress his Kenyan grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, suffered on Churchill\u2019s orders ?<\/span><\/p>\n Removing a bust is a fairly simple matter, but toppling a statue is quite another. In Westminster Square in front of Parliament in London there are several statues of deceased politicians and dignitaries, one of which I find particularly distasteful. Hands clasped behind back, the jodphur-clad figure striding purposely forward is that of Jan Christian Smuts. racist forefather of the Apartheid system in South Africa.<\/span><\/p>\n As for Churchill, who, as Home Secretary, said:<\/span><\/p>\n \u2018I propose that 100,000 degenerate Britons should be forcibly sterilized and others put in labour camps to halt the decline of the British race.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n His hulking toadish statue stands tall on a granite plinth, clutching a walking stick, his unblinking bulldog gaze on the Houses of Parliament where he reigned twice as a Conservative Prime Minister.<\/span><\/p>\n If I were Prime Minister of Great Britain, one of the first things on my list would be the removal of memorials to facist-minded racist imperialists. The statues of Smuts and Churchill in Parliament Square would be the first to come down.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Michael Dickinson<\/em><\/strong> can be contacted at <\/em>michaelyabanji@gmail.com<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n Source : <\/span>http:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/2015\/01\/28\/winston-churchill-the-imperial-monster\/<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n URL de cet article : <\/span><\/strong>http:\/\/blog.lesgrossesorchadeslesamplesthalameges.fr\/index.php\/winston-churchill-the-imperial-monster\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/blog.lesgrossesorchadeslesamplesthalameges.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/CHURCHILL.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n